Payload CMS Audit
Fixed scope · Fixed price · Written report
Know exactly what is wrong with your Payload CMS codebase.
A structured technical review of your existing Payload CMS project. Not a sales call. Not a vague assessment. A written report that identifies the data model problems, query issues, migration risks, and the three most critical issues in your codebase — in priority order.
When contacting, mention “Payload CMS Audit” in your message.
What the audit covers
The audit is a technical review of your existing Payload CMS codebase. Every review covers the same five areas, plus a prioritized list of critical findings. The output is a written report — not a presentation, not a Zoom call, not a list of suggestions. A document you can act on.
Data model review
Collection structure, field types, relationships, and globals. Whether the schema supports where the system needs to go — or will require expensive rework.
Query patterns
How data is fetched, filtered, and paginated. N+1 patterns, missing indexes, and query structures that degrade as data volume grows.
Performance risks
Admin UI slowdowns, frontend rendering bottlenecks, hook chains that block requests, and background job configurations that will fail under load.
Migration setup
Whether database migrations are configured correctly for production — or whether the project is running push mode where it shouldn’t be.
Top 3 critical issues
Every report surfaces the three issues most likely to cause production failure, data loss, or expensive re-architecture. These are prioritized, not buried in a list.
Recommended next steps
Concrete recommendations for each finding — what to fix, in what order, and whether the scope requires a structured engagement or your team can handle it independently.
The deliverable
The audit is fixed scope and fixed price. There is no discovery phase, no workshop, no ongoing commitment required. You get codebase access to me, I review it, you get a written report.
Fixed price
$2,500 – $3,500
Price depends on codebase size and complexity. Confirmed after a brief description of the project.
This is for the written report. If you want a structured advisory engagement to act on the findings, that is a separate conversation.
Who this is for
The audit is for technical leads and CTOs with an existing Payload CMS codebase that has real concerns — performance degradation, data model decisions that may not scale, a migration from another CMS that wasn't structured correctly, or a codebase built by a previous team that now needs a clear-eyed assessment.
It is not for greenfield projects. If you haven't started building yet, what you need is architecture design at the start of an engagement, not a review of something that doesn't exist.
Most audit engagements come through referral from the Payload team or previous clients. If you were referred here, this page exists to make the engagement formal: defined scope, defined price, defined deliverable.
What happens after the report
Most companies that commission an audit fall into one of three situations after receiving the report.
01
Your team handles it
The report is clear enough to act on independently. Your developers work through the findings. No further engagement needed.
02
Ongoing advisory
The audit surfaces architecture risks your team needs direction on. We move into a structured advisory engagement: weekly sessions, async review, and risk reduction while your team builds.
03
Full rebuild engagement
The codebase has foundational issues that can't be fixed incrementally. The audit becomes the basis for a structured rebuild scoped to fix what actually matters.
The audit has no obligation attached. If the report is useful and you want to continue, we talk about what that looks like. If it answers your questions and your team takes it from there, that's a good outcome too.
Related resources
Next.js + Payload CMS Advisory
The natural next step after an audit. Senior architecture direction for in-house teams — weekly sessions, async review, and risk reduction while your team builds.
Payload CMS Developer
If the audit findings point to a rebuild, see how a full principal-led Payload CMS engagement works — from architecture through launch.
Request a Payload CMS Audit.
Mention \u201cPayload CMS Audit\u201d in your message and briefly describe the codebase \u2014 framework version, approximate collection count, and the primary concern driving the review.
Get in Touch