Know exactly what is wrong with your Payload CMS codebase.
What the audit covers
The audit is a technical review of your existing Payload CMS codebase. Every review covers the same five areas, plus a prioritized list of critical findings. The output is a written report — not a presentation, not a Zoom call, not a list of suggestions. A document you can act on.
Data model review
Collection structure, field types, relationships, and globals. Whether the schema supports where the system needs to go — or will require expensive rework.
Query patterns
How data is fetched, filtered, and paginated. N+1 patterns, missing indexes, and query structures that degrade as data volume grows.
Performance risks
Admin UI slowdowns, frontend rendering bottlenecks, hook chains that block requests, and background job configurations that will fail under load.
Migration setup
Whether database migrations are configured correctly for production — or whether the project is running push mode where it shouldn’t be.
Top 3 critical issues
Every report surfaces the three issues most likely to cause production failure, data loss, or expensive re-architecture. These are prioritized, not buried in a list.
Recommended next steps
Concrete recommendations for each finding — what to fix, in what order, and whether the scope requires a structured engagement.
The deliverable
The audit is fixed scope and fixed price. There is no discovery phase, no workshop, no ongoing commitment required. You get codebase access to me, I review it, you get a written report.
Fixed price
$2,500 – $3,500
Price depends on codebase size and complexity. Confirmed after a brief description of the project.
This is for the written report. If you want a structured advisory engagement to act on the findings, that is a separate conversation.
Related resources
Next.js + Payload CMS Advisory
Open resource
Payload CMS Developer
Open resource
Payload CMS Live Demos
Open resource
Request a Payload CMS Audit.
Mention “Payload CMS Audit” in your message and briefly describe the codebase — framework version, approximate collection count, and the primary concern driving the review.
Get in Touch