BuildWithMatija
CMS Strategy & Implementation

Migrate to Payload CMS without losing content, SEO, or editorial workflows.

I help teams move from WordPress, Drupal, AEM, Wix, Squarespace, Webflow, Contentful, Sanity, and Strapi to Payload CMS. The work covers content inventory, schema mapping, migration scripts, media handling, redirects, SEO preservation, testing, and cutover — principal-led, architecture-first, no handoffs.
Book a Payload migration auditSee migration paths
Note:This page covers CMS content migrations — moving your posts, pages, assets, and data structures from your current platform to Payload CMS. If you’re looking for Payload’s built-in database schema migration tooling (the payload migrate CLI), read the guide: Payload CMS Migrations Explained — create, run, rollback, and schema changes.

Looking for Payload’s migration CLI? Read: Payload CMS Migrations Explained: create, run, rollback, and schema changes.

If the migration is driven by fragmentation across brands, regions, or separate CMS instances, the broader multi-tenant CMS architecture guide is the right decision layer before tool selection.

Earlier-Funnel Decision Page

Still estimating whether migration is worth it at all?

If you are still comparing options, budget ranges, and migration risk, start with the broader CMS migration cost page before moving into a Payload-specific discussion.

The CMS migration cost page frames the earlier decision: what migration is, when it is worth it, what usually drives cost, and how platform differences change the difficulty. It also includes the interactive estimator for a directional difficulty and cost band.

Best used when

  • You are still comparing source-target CMS pairs
  • You need a directional difficulty and cost band first
  • The migration decision is broader than Payload alone
Open the CMS migration cost pageSee the multi-tenant CMS guide

Decision Framework

Is now the right time to move?

Migration is a significant investment of both capital and engineering time. It shouldn’t be done for the sake of following a trend. It should be done because your current system has become a bottleneck to your business operations.

Signals a migration is the right move:

WordPress Plugin Debt

You spend more time patching security vulnerabilities and fighting plugin conflicts than building new features.

Contentful API Scaling

Your monthly SaaS bill is increasing faster than your traffic, and you're hitting "API record" limits that force architectural compromises.

AI Integration Barriers

You need to implement custom AI agents, SEO automation, or RAG systems, but your current CMS's closed ecosystem makes integration fragile or impossible.

Multi-tenant Requirements

You are managing multiple brands or markets and need a single, unified backend that doesn't charge per "space" or "site."

Signals that you should wait:

No Internal Developers

Payload is a code-first CMS. If you don't have a developer team or a long-term partner, a "no-code" builder might serve you better.

Simple Marketing Needs

If your site is 5 static pages that rarely change and has no complex data relationships, the ROI on migration isn't there.

Budget Constraints

Professional Payload CMS engagements start from $1,500 for content-only migrations. Full platform rebuilds start from $15k.

The Process

What a Payload CMS Migration Plan Looks Like

A CMS migration plan has five phases. I treat each one as an infrastructure project — the kind where skipping a phase creates compounding problems later.

1

Phase 1: Audit and Content Inventory

Before a single line of code is written, we catalog every content type, field, and asset. We identify "dead weight" content that shouldn't be migrated and map existing relationships to a cleaner, typed schema.

! Deciding what NOT to migrate.

2

Phase 2: Content Model Mapping

We translate your current CMS schema into Payload Collections and Globals. This is where we fix the technical debt of your old system—turning messy HTML blobs into structured Lexical blocks or typed fields.

! Reversing poor modeling decisions from the past.

3

Phase 3: Data Transformation & Scripting

Using custom Node.js scripts and Payload’s Local API, we extract data from your source (REST/GraphQL/SQL), transform it to match the new schema, and programmatically import it. This ensures 100% data integrity that manual entry can't match.

! Handling edge cases, nested relationships, and malformed source data.

4

Phase 4: SEO & URL Preservation

The biggest risk in migration is losing search rankings. We map every old URL to its new equivalent, implement automated 301 redirects, and ensure that metadata and schema.org markup are preserved or improved.

! Ensuring 1:1 URL mapping for 10,000+ page datasets.

5

Phase 5: Cutover & Stabilization

We run the new Payload system in parallel with your old CMS for a "freeze period" to verify data. Once validated, we switch the DNS.

! Orchestrating the final delta-import without business interruption.

Scope

What actually gets migrated.

A real migration is not just "move the posts." This is the scope I plan around so nothing falls through the cracks at cutover — including the metadata and redirects that protect your search traffic.

Pages
Posts / articles
Authors and user roles
Categories and tags
Media library
Alt text and image metadata
SEO titles and descriptions
Slugs and URL structure
301 redirects
Custom fields
ACF fields
Rich text / Gutenberg blocks
Localized / multilingual content
Forms
Product and catalog data (where relevant)

Source CMS Comparison

How hard is your migration, and what does Payload replace?

A rough guide to difficulty, the main risk to plan around, and the Payload target model each source maps onto. Every engagement starts with an audit that sharpens these numbers for your specific setup.

Source CMSDifficultyMain riskBest Payload target model
WordPressMedium to HighPlugin / ACF / Gutenberg cleanupPages, Posts, Blocks, Globals
DrupalHighEntity / reference complexityTyped collections and relationships
AEMHighEnterprise workflows and DAM assetsStructured content + DAM strategy
WixMediumLimited export, messy URLsClean rebuilt content model
SquarespaceMediumTemplate / content extractionMarketing site rebuild
WebflowMediumCMS collection mappingNext.js + Payload frontend
ContentfulMediumAPI / content model differencesCollections and localized fields
SanityMediumPortable Text and GROQ structureLexical / blocks / typed fields

Source-Specific Migration Paths

Moving from your current platform.

Each platform has its own traps. These sections cover what usually goes wrong, what maps cleanly into Payload, and when the move is worth it — so you can scope the risk before you commit.

Migrating from WordPress to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Medium to High
Why teams migrate

Eliminating plugin debt, improving performance, and moving to a typed system your developers can actually extend — without the constant security patching and plugin-conflict maintenance.

What is usually hard

Unwinding years of plugin-dependent data, cleaning up ACF sprawl, and mapping Gutenberg or Classic Editor HTML into structured Payload fields and Lexical blocks.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Posts, pages, categories, tags, media, users, and roles map cleanly to Payload collections. ACF field groups become typed field definitions.

What needs custom transformation

Gutenberg and Classic Editor HTML are parsed into Lexical blocks; WooCommerce product/order data, shortcodes, and plugin-specific blobs need custom transformation scripts.

SEO / redirect risk

Medium. Permalink structures must map 1:1 and 301 redirect automation covers every retained URL. Most clients see an SEO lift from improved speed and schema markup.

When migration is worth it

When plugin debt, security patching, or performance ceilings are blocking your roadmap.

Typical scope

  • Plugin audit and removal
  • Gutenberg or Classic Editor HTML extraction into structured Lexical blocks
  • WooCommerce product and order data migration when needed
  • Media library migration with optimized asset handling
  • User and role mapping
  • 301 redirect automation for every retained URL
  • ACF (Advanced Custom Fields) remapped to typed Payload fields

Recent WordPress migrations

Ad Art Sign Co. to Payload CMS

314+ pages migrated from WordPress into a typed Payload setup. The result supports multi-tenant brand architecture, an AI chatbot with RAG, a vendor portal, and a content model rebuilt from accumulated plugin debt.

View adart.com

Making Light to Payload CMS

Migrated from WordPress to Payload CMS with content extraction and a full Next.js frontend rebuild. The migration replaced a legacy editing workflow with a structured content system that is easier to maintain.

View making-light.com

3-CMS Consolidation to Single Payload Infrastructure

Merged WordPress, ProcessWire, and Ghost into one multi-tenant Payload backend. Three admin panels, three databases, and three credential sets were consolidated into one typed system with shared operational logic.

Client details anonymized. Full project context available during initial conversations.

Discuss your WordPress migration Compare WordPress vs Payload CMSRead the WordPress to Payload migration guide

Migrating from AEM to Payload CMS

Difficulty: High
Why teams migrate

Adobe Experience Manager licensing scales per author and per environment, and most changes route through specialized AEM developers or a systems integrator. Teams move to Payload to cut licensing overhead and regain a code-first, TypeScript-native stack their in-house engineers own end to end.

What is usually hard

AEM’s JCR repository, nested content fragments, and DAM-managed assets don’t map 1:1 to a document model. Workflows, versioning, replication, and permissions are deeply embedded in the platform.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Content fragments and experience fragments translate well into Payload collections and blocks; structured component definitions become typed field groups.

What needs custom transformation

DAM assets need re-processing and re-referencing; workflows and replication rules are rebuilt as Payload hooks and access policies rather than migrated verbatim.

SEO / redirect risk

High. AEM URLs often include dispatcher and selector segments, and vanity URLs plus redirect maps must be reconstructed carefully.

When migration is worth it

When AEM licensing and integration overhead exceed the value of its enterprise workflows, or when you want to bring development in-house.

Discuss your AEM migration

Migrating from Drupal to Payload CMS

Difficulty: High
Why teams migrate

Drupal’s entity-reference and Views layers are powerful but opaque — extending them requires Drupal specialists. Payload gives you a typed REST/GraphQL API your generalist team can maintain and extend without a PhD in Drupal architecture.

What is usually hard

Nodes, fields, taxonomies, paragraph bundles, and Views queries form a tightly coupled graph that resists flat extraction.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Content types map to collections, taxonomy vocabularies to relationship fields, and paragraphs to Lexical blocks or nested groups.

What needs custom transformation

Views-generated listings and dynamic references are re-implemented as queries and front-end logic; field formatters and contrib-module data often need manual interpretation.

SEO / redirect risk

Medium to high. Pathauto aliases, taxonomy term paths, and multilingual path prefixes must be preserved 1:1.

When migration is worth it

When your team spends more time managing Drupal module upgrades and entity architecture than shipping features.

Discuss your Drupal migration

Migrating from Wix to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Medium
Why teams migrate

Wix locks content into a proprietary builder with limited export, poor API access, and template-driven URL structures that hurt SEO at scale. Moving to Payload gives you a system you actually own, with a real data model and a Next.js frontend.

What is usually hard

There is no clean content export — data lives inside template blocks and Wix’s closed data model.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Almost nothing maps directly. Wix is a site builder, not a structured CMS, so the content model is rebuilt from scratch in Payload.

What needs custom transformation

Content is extracted from the rendered site and re-authored into a typed Payload schema; media is re-hosted and re-linked.

SEO / redirect risk

High. Wix URLs are messy and often change, so a full redirect map from old Wix URLs to clean new slugs is essential.

When migration is worth it

When you have outgrown the builder and want ownership of your content layer and frontend.

Discuss your Wix migration

Migrating from Squarespace to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Medium
Why teams migrate

Squarespace is great for getting started but caps customization, data portability, and integration. Growing teams hit walls on schema design, multilingual content, and headless delivery.

What is usually hard

There is no structured export; blog posts, products, and page content sit inside template-specific structures.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Like Wix, the model is rebuilt — Squarespace collections become Payload collections and Globals.

What needs custom transformation

Blog content and product/catalog data are extracted and re-modeled; the design is rebuilt on Next.js.

SEO / redirect risk

Medium. Squarespace blog and product URLs need redirect mapping to the new structure.

When migration is worth it

When you need headless delivery, custom data relationships, or full ownership of your content layer.

Discuss your Squarespace migration

Migrating from Webflow to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Medium
Why teams migrate

Webflow’s CMS is shallow beyond marketing pages — complex relationships, localization, and backend logic push teams toward a real headless CMS. Per-seat and hosting costs also climb as you scale.

What is usually hard

Webflow CMS collections have hard item limits and limited field types, and reference fields are basic.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Webflow CMS collections map to Payload collections and reference fields to relationships — the mapping is conceptually clean.

What needs custom transformation

The frontend rebuilds on Next.js while the collection schema expands to richer field types and nested relationships.

SEO / redirect risk

Medium. Webflow CMS item slugs and collection paths should map 1:1, but the domain and hosting move requires careful DNS and redirect handling.

When migration is worth it

When Webflow’s CMS limits or hosting costs block your roadmap and you want a Next.js + Payload frontend.

Discuss your Webflow migration

Migrating from Contentful or Sanity to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Medium
Why teams migrate

Cut SaaS API and record costs, regain ownership of your backend code, and drop the proprietary query layers (GROQ for Sanity, Contentful’s billing model). Move to a standard TypeScript-first environment.

What is usually hard

Contentful Rich Text JSON must convert to Payload’s Lexical format; Sanity Portable Text plus GROQ must move to standard REST/GraphQL with Lexical.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Content types and schemas map to collections, locales to Payload localization, and references to relationship fields.

What needs custom transformation

Rich text formats need format conversion, and asset pipelines plus CDN references are re-pointed to your own storage.

SEO / redirect risk

Low. URLs are usually frontend-controlled, so SEO risk lives in the frontend rebuild rather than the CMS swap.

When migration is worth it

When API billing, vendor lock-in, or integration limits outweigh the value of the managed editor.

Discuss your Contentful or Sanity migration Compare Contentful vs Payload CMSCompare Sanity vs Payload CMS

Migrating from Strapi to Payload CMS

Difficulty: Low
Why teams migrate

Better TypeScript integration and a far superior developer experience for custom admin extensions, with a fully code-defined schema that is easier to version and review.

What is usually hard

While structurally similar to Payload, Strapi still requires a full rebuild of the admin UI and a data-load script to handle relationship differences.

What maps cleanly into Payload

Content types map almost directly to Payload collections and components to blocks or field groups.

What needs custom transformation

Relationship IDs and media references are remapped during import; lifecycle hooks are re-implemented as Payload hooks.

SEO / redirect risk

Low. Like other headless CMSs, URLs are frontend-controlled.

When migration is worth it

When you want a tighter TypeScript workflow and a code-first schema without leaving the self-hosted, open-source model.

Discuss your Strapi migration Compare Strapi vs Payload CMS

Migration Guides

Step-by-Step Migration Guides

If your team is handling the migration in-house, these technical guides cover each platform in depth.

How to Plan a CMS Migration: The Complete Checklist

Not sure where to start? This guide covers all five phases of a migration — content audit, content model redesign, data transformation, SEO preservation, and cutover.

Read the guide

How to Migrate from WordPress to Payload CMS

Read the guide

How to Migrate from Contentful to Payload CMS

Read the guide

How to Migrate from Sanity to Payload CMS

Read the guide

How we engage

How we engage.

Every option here ends on Payload CMS. This is not a generic migration service. The difference is how much of the surrounding platform we rebuild around the migration.

Engagement TypeStarting PointScope
Payload CMS MigrationFrom $1,500Content and data only. Audit, schema mapping, transformation scripts, import, and redirect handling. Your frontend stays untouched.
Migration + Next.js IntegrationFrom $5,000Everything above plus wiring the new Payload backend into your existing or new Next.js frontend.
Full Payload CMS Platform RebuildFrom $15,000Greenfield Payload architecture, content modeling, frontend build, and full cutover. End-to-end.
Book a Migration Audit

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does a Payload CMS migration take?

A typical enterprise migration takes 4 to 12 weeks. This includes auditing, scripting, testing, and the parallel-running period.

Will we lose SEO rankings when we migrate?

Not if done correctly. I prioritize 1:1 URL mapping and 301 redirect automation. By improving site speed and schema markup during the migration, most clients actually see an SEO lift post-launch.

Can we migrate without rebuilding the frontend?

Yes. If you already have a modern React/Next.js frontend, we can swap the API source from your old CMS to Payload.

What happens to our existing content during migration?

Your old site remains live and untouched. We extract the data, transform it in a staging environment, and only switch the DNS once the new Payload site is fully validated.

Ready to move to a system you actually own?

Stop fighting your CMS and start building on business infrastructure. Let's discuss your current setup and whether a migration to Payload CMS is the right strategic move for your team.

Book a Migration Audit
Build with Matija logo

Build with Matija

Modern websites, content systems, and AI workflows built for long-term growth.

Services

  • Headless CMS Websites
  • Next.js & Headless CMS Advisory
  • AI Systems & Automation
  • Website & Content Audit

Resources

  • Case Studies
  • How I Work
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • CMS Hub
  • E-commerce Hub
  • B2B Website Strategy
  • Dashboard

Headless CMS

  • Payload CMS Developer
  • CMS Migration
  • Multi-Tenant CMS
  • Payload vs Sanity
  • Payload vs WordPress
  • Payload vs Contentful

Get in Touch

Ready to modernize your stack? Let's talk about what you're building.

Book a discovery callContact me →
© 2026Build with Matija•All rights reserved•Privacy Policy•Terms of Service
BuildWithMatija
Get In Touch