Paid diagnostic · B2B websites & content
Website and Growth Opportunity Review
Most companies come here because something feels off. The site is not performing, search visibility has plateaued, or the content structure no longer reflects how the business works. This is a structured website audit, content audit, and website strategy review led by a website consultant who can span diagnosis, architecture, and implementation. You get a clear view of what is creating drag, where growth opportunity is being missed, and what to fix first.
Manual review. Not an automated website audit.
Fixed scope
No open-ended discovery
One memo
Decision-ready deliverable
$1,500
Flat fee, scoped upfront
What I review
- Website messaging and conversion friction
- Content structure and content audit findings
- Search visibility and missed demand signals
- CMS fit and migration pressure
- Practical AI and automation opportunities
Who this is for
- You are a founder, CEO, COO, or head of growth at a B2B company with real revenue but a website that does not reflect the business.
- Your digital presence feels behind competitors and you know it — but you do not know where to start or what to prioritise.
- You rely on sales-led growth and want to understand whether your current website and content setup are actually supporting it or creating drag.
- You need someone who can span diagnosis, architecture, and implementation — not a generic consultant who hands you a list of observations.
- You want clarity and a concrete next step, not an open-ended engagement.
Industry-specific context is also available for manufacturing and construction companies.
What a website audit should actually uncover
Most website audits produce a list of technical observations. This one is structured around the decisions you actually need to make.
01
What is underperforming now
Where your current website and content setup are creating friction — for buyers, for search engines, or for your own team trying to keep things updated.
02
Where visibility and growth opportunity are being missed
What demand exists that your setup is not capturing, what competitors are doing differently, and what it would take to close the gap — including a light competitor context check where relevant.
03
Whether to improve what you have or change the stack
An honest improve-versus-migrate recommendation based on your situation, not a preference for any particular platform. If migration is the direction, the recommendation connects directly to a concrete migration path. If the codebase is worth keeping, a focused technical audit is often the right next step.
04
Where AI and automation could practically help
Specific, bounded opportunities where automation could reduce manual work or improve output quality — and where it will not change anything material. When the opportunity extends into internal systems, the review connects to the bespoke AI applications path.
05
What to fix first
A prioritised now / next / later roadmap. Not a backlog. A clear sequence with the reasoning behind the order.
Website content audit: where visibility and trust are leaking
The content side of the audit covers four areas where B2B sites consistently lose ground — not from technical failures, but from structure and positioning gaps that compound quietly.
Messaging and positioning
Is the site saying the right things to the right people in the right order? Most B2B sites lead with features or services instead of the buyer problem.
Content structure
How content is organised and whether the structure reflects the way buyers actually move through a decision — or just how the business thinks about itself.
Search visibility gaps
What organic demand exists, who is capturing it, and what your current site is leaving on the table. This is about missed demand signals, not keyword chasing.
Publishing and content operations
Whether your current setup makes it easy or painful to keep content accurate, updated, and useful. Operational drag here compounds over time.
Should you improve your current CMS or migrate
The CMS decision is often where companies get stuck. The review produces a clear recommendation — not a framework for thinking about it, but an actual direction based on your situation.
Signals you should improve what you have
- The platform is structurally sound and the main issues are content, messaging, or visibility.
- A rebuild would create significant disruption without fixing the underlying problems.
- The team is already capable of working in the current stack.
Signals you should migrate
- The current system creates consistent friction for editors, developers, or both.
- Content modeling is too rigid for how the business actually operates.
- You are carrying technical debt that limits what can be built on top.
If a migration is on the table, the Payload CMS migration page covers the full process — from audit through cutover — for teams moving from WordPress, Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, and other platforms.
If you are comparing CMS platforms, these technical comparisons may help: Payload CMS vs WordPress · Payload CMS vs Contentful · Payload CMS vs Sanity · Payload CMS vs Strapi
Where AI automation could help, and where it will not
The review surfaces practical AI and automation opportunities specific to your situation. The emphasis is on practical — where automation reduces real manual work, not where it adds complexity without material benefit.
Content operations
Drafting, formatting, tagging, and summarising at scale — where output volume is high and manual effort is disproportionate.
Search and retrieval
Semantic search over internal content, documentation, or product data — particularly useful when the site has depth that buyers cannot currently navigate.
Lead qualification and routing
Automating the first layer of intake — form responses, inquiry triage, or chatbot-assisted qualification before a human gets involved.
Where AI automation will not help: positioning and messaging problems, weak content structure, or the wrong platform. Those require judgment, not automation.
When the review does surface a real AI opportunity, the work can extend into a bespoke AI application engagement — purpose-built internal systems where AI operates on real business data.
What to fix first
- Written review memo covering website, content structure, search visibility, CMS direction, and AI opportunities
- Content audit findings — structure, trust gaps, and missed visibility opportunities
- Opportunity snapshot — what is being missed and what it is worth addressing
- Improve vs. migrate recommendation with clear reasoning
- CMS and architecture direction if relevant to your situation
- Shortlist of practical AI and automation opportunities
- Prioritised now / next / later roadmap
- One-hour walkthrough call to go through the memo and answer questions
For context on how I approach this work — from diagnosis through architecture and build — see how I work.
The memo is written to be a decision tool — light on implementation detail, heavy on tradeoffs, timelines, and what to do next.
Need clarity before committing to a rebuild or migration? Book a 20-minute discovery call to see if the review is the right fit.
Book a discovery callOr get in touch directly if you prefer to describe your situation in writing first.Who this is and isn't for
This is for you if
- Decision makers at B2B companies who need clarity before committing to a rebuild or migration.
- Companies with a working business that know digital execution is a weak point.
- Founders or operators who want an outside view they can actually act on.
- Teams about to make a significant platform or content decision and want it made correctly.
Not a fit if
- You need someone to start building immediately — this is a diagnostic, not implementation.
- You are looking for a detailed SEO engagement or ongoing content strategy retainer.
- You want multiple stakeholder workshops across departments.
- You have no budget signal and are exploring speculatively.
If you already know you need a Payload CMS build, the Payload CMS developer page covers the engagement model directly. The review is for teams that need the diagnosis first.
Why this review is different
This is not a generic audit from someone who only diagnoses. I work across website architecture, content systems, CMS migrations, and practical AI implementation. That means the review is grounded in what can actually be improved, rebuilt, migrated, or automated next — not just what looks broken from the outside.
Read more about how I work and the engagement model behind every project.
How it works
01
Discovery call
Free · 20 min
A quick conversation to confirm this is the right fit. We cover your situation, what you are trying to figure out, and whether the review will give you what you need. No pitch.
02
Kickoff session
Included · 60 min
A structured intake call where we go through your current setup, your goals, and the decisions you are facing. This is where I collect everything I need to do the review properly.
03
Review delivery
Written memo + walkthrough
You receive the full written memo. We then walk through it together on a one-hour call — not to present findings, but to answer your questions and help you decide what happens next.
What happens next depends on the findings. Common paths include a B2B website development engagement, a Payload CMS migration, a technical advisory arrangement for in-house teams, or acting on the memo independently.
$1,500 — fixed scope, one deliverable.
No open-ended discovery. No retainer. One review, one memo, one walkthrough. The scope is clear before we start and the fee does not change.
Questions buyers usually have
Is this just an SEO audit?
No. Search visibility is one lens, not the whole scope. The review also covers messaging, content structure, CMS fit, platform direction, and practical AI opportunities. The output is a decision tool, not a ranking report.
Do you review Search Console and analytics?
Yes. If access is available, I review Search Console and analytics to identify visibility gaps, underperforming pages, and missed demand signals. If access is not available, I can still review the site and content structure directly.
Will this tell us whether to keep our CMS or migrate?
Yes. One of the outputs is a clear improve vs. migrate recommendation based on your current setup, team, and growth needs. That decision is covered directly, not left as an open question. If you are already comparing specific platforms, the site has detailed comparisons: Payload vs Sanity, Payload vs Contentful, Payload vs WordPress, and Payload vs Strapi.
Is Payload CMS always the recommendation?
No. The recommendation is based on your situation, not a predetermined platform preference. Some setups are worth improving in place. Others genuinely need a migration. The review tells you which. If Payload is the right direction, the pricing page covers what a build actually costs, and you can explore the live demos to see working systems before committing.
What do I need to prepare?
Access to your analytics and Search Console if available, and about 60 minutes for the kickoff call. That is it. Most of what I need I can find directly.
What happens after the review?
That is up to you. The memo is written to stand alone — you can take it to your team, your agency, or act on it yourself. If implementation work makes sense, common next steps include a full B2B website development engagement or advisory for in-house teams already building with Next.js and Payload. There is no pressure to continue.
How long does it take?
Typically one to two weeks from the kickoff call to delivery, depending on the complexity of your current setup.
Is the scope fixed?
Yes. One business unit, one primary website, one review cycle, one memo, one walkthrough call. This is intentionally bounded so it stays useful and actionable rather than sprawling.